added docs from the etherpad

2 files changed, 135 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/cronos-windows-install.md b/cronos-windows-install.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9d22a86
--- /dev/null
+++ b/cronos-windows-install.md
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+#Question marks instead of Russian letters, a solution to the problem with Windows encoding
+
+I noticed on one computer that instead of Russian letters on the command line and in some programs question marks are displayed.
+
+First of all, you need to make sure that the language of the system is selected in Russian, for this, go to “Start” – “Control Panel” – “Clock, language and region” – “Language and regional standards”, tab “Advanced”, section “Program language, those that do not support Unicode, you must click “Change the system language” and select “Russian (Russia)” and click “OK” in all windows.
+
+Also, to solve the problem, open the registry editor by typing “regedit.exe” at the command line.
+You can open the command line by clicking on the shortcut in the “Start” menu – “All Programs” – “Standard” – “Command Prompt” or by typing “cmd” in the search bar of the “Start” menu.
+
+In the registry editor, you must open the branch:
+    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Nls\CodePage
+and change the parameter values 1250 (from `c_1250.nls` to `c_1251.nls`), 1251 (make sure `c_1251.nls`), 1252 (from `c_1252.nls` to `c_1251.nls`).
diff --git a/erdgeist-research.md b/erdgeist-research.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..517137c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/erdgeist-research.md
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+# About Cronos databases.
+
+A _cronos database_ consists of those files
+
+    CroBank.dat
+    CroBank.tad
+    CroIndex.dat
+    CroIndex.tad
+    CroStru.dat
+    CroStru.tad
+
+and a Vocabulary database with another set of these files in a sub directory Voc/
+
+`CroIndex.*` can be ignored, unless we suspect there to be residues of old data. All words are serialized in little endianess.
+
+On a default Windows installation, the CronosPro app shows with several encoding issues that can be fixed like this: 
+
+    reg set HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Nls\Codepage 1250=c_1251.nls 1252=c_1251.nls
+
+[from](https://ixnfo.com/en/question-marks-instead-of-russian-letters-a-solution-to-the-problem-with-windows-encoding.html)
+
+##Files ending in .dat
+
+All .dat files start with the string `"CroFile\0"` and then 8 more header bytes
+
+`CroStru.dat` has
+
+    xx yy 30 31 2e 30 32 01 == ? ? 0 1 . 0 2 ?
+
+
+CroBank.dat and CroIndex.dat have (as found in the big dump)
+
+    xx yy 30 31 2e 30 32 0[0123] == ? ? 0 1 . 0 2 ?
+
+    xx yy 30 31 2e 30 33 0[023]  == ? ? 0 1 . 0 3 ?
+
+    xx yy 30 31 2e 30 34 03      == ? ? 0 1 . 0 4 ?
+
+
+which seems to be the version identifier. The xx yy part is unclear but seems not to be random, might be a checksum.
+
+In `CroBank.dat` there's a bias towards 313 times c8 05, 196 times b8 00, 116 times 4e 13, 95 times 00 00, and 81 times 98 00 out of 1964 databases.
+
+In `CroStru.dat` there's a bias towards 351 times c8 05, 224 times b8 00, 119 times 4e 13, 103 times 00 00 and 83 times 98 00 out of 1964 databases.
+
+In `CroIndex.dat` there's a bias towards 312 times c8 05, 194 times b8 00, 107 times 4e 13, 107 times 00 00 and 82 times 98 00 out of 1964 databases.
+
+##Files ending in .tad
+
+The first two `uint32_t` seem to be the amount and the offset to the first free block.
+
+The original description made it look like there were different formats for the block references, but all entries in the .tads appear to follow the scheme:
+
+    uint32_t offset
+    uint32_t size       // with flag in upper bit, 0 -> large record
+    uint32_t checksum   // but sometimes just 0x00000000, 0x00000001 or 0x00000002
+
+where size can be 0xffffffff (probably to indicate a free/deleted block) some size entries have their top bits set. In some files the offset looks garbled but usually the top bit of the size then is set.
+
+large records start with plaintext: { uint32 offset, uint32 size? }
+followed by data obfuscated with 'shift==0'
+
+The old description would also assume 12 byte reference blocks but a packed struct
+
+    uint32_t offset1
+    uint16_t size1
+    uint32_t offset2
+    uint16_t size2
+
+with the first chunk read from offset1 with length size1 and potentially more parts with total length of size2 starting at file offset offset2 with the first `uint32_t` of the 256 byte chunk being the next chunk's offset and a maximum of 252 bytes being actual data.
+
+However, I never found files with .tad like that. Also the original description insisted on those chunks needing the decode-magic outlined below, but the python implementation only does that for CroStru files and still seems to produce results.
+
+##CroStru
+
+Interesting files are CroStru.dat containing metadata on the database within blocks whose size and length are found in CroStru.tad. These blocks are rotated byte wise using an sbox found in the cro2sql sources and then each byte is incremented by a one byte counter which is initialised by a per block offset. The sbox looks like this:
+
+    unsigned char kod[256] = {
+      0x08, 0x63, 0x81, 0x38, 0xa3, 0x6b, 0x82, 0xa6,
+      0x18, 0x0d, 0xac, 0xd5, 0xfe, 0xbe, 0x15, 0xf6,
+      0xa5, 0x36, 0x76, 0xe2, 0x2d, 0x41, 0xb5, 0x12,
+      0x4b, 0xd8, 0x3c, 0x56, 0x34, 0x46, 0x4f, 0xa4,
+      0xd0, 0x01, 0x8b, 0x60, 0x0f, 0x70, 0x57, 0x3e,
+      0x06, 0x67, 0x02, 0x7a, 0xf8, 0x8c, 0x80, 0xe8,
+      0xc3, 0xfd, 0x0a, 0x3a, 0xa7, 0x73, 0xb0, 0x4d,
+      0x99, 0xa2, 0xf1, 0xfb, 0x5a, 0xc7, 0xc2, 0x17,
+      0x96, 0x71, 0xba, 0x2a, 0xa9, 0x9a, 0xf3, 0x87,
+      0xea, 0x8e, 0x09, 0x9e, 0xb9, 0x47, 0xd4, 0x97,
+      0xe4, 0xb3, 0xbc, 0x58, 0x53, 0x5f, 0x2e, 0x21,
+      0xd1, 0x1a, 0xee, 0x2c, 0x64, 0x95, 0xf2, 0xb8,
+      0xc6, 0x33, 0x8d, 0x2b, 0x1f, 0xf7, 0x25, 0xad,
+      0xff, 0x7f, 0x39, 0xa8, 0xbf, 0x6a, 0x91, 0x79,
+      0xed, 0x20, 0x7b, 0xa1, 0xbb, 0x45, 0x69, 0xcd,
+      0xdc, 0xe7, 0x31, 0xaa, 0xf0, 0x65, 0xd7, 0xa0,
+      0x32, 0x93, 0xb1, 0x24, 0xd6, 0x5b, 0x9f, 0x27,
+      0x42, 0x85, 0x07, 0x44, 0x3f, 0xb4, 0x11, 0x68,
+      0x5e, 0x49, 0x29, 0x13, 0x94, 0xe6, 0x1b, 0xe1,
+      0x7d, 0xc8, 0x2f, 0xfa, 0x78, 0x1d, 0xe3, 0xde,
+      0x50, 0x4e, 0x89, 0xb6, 0x30, 0x48, 0x0c, 0x10,
+      0x05, 0x43, 0xce, 0xd3, 0x61, 0x51, 0x83, 0xda,
+      0x77, 0x6f, 0x92, 0x9d, 0x74, 0x7c, 0x04, 0x88,
+      0x86, 0x55, 0xca, 0xf4, 0xc1, 0x62, 0x0e, 0x28,
+      0xb7, 0x0b, 0xc0, 0xf5, 0xcf, 0x35, 0xc5, 0x4c,
+      0x16, 0xe0, 0x98, 0x00, 0x9b, 0xd9, 0xae, 0x03,
+      0xaf, 0xec, 0xc9, 0xdb, 0x6d, 0x3b, 0x26, 0x75,
+      0x3d, 0xbd, 0xb2, 0x4a, 0x5d, 0x6c, 0x72, 0x40,
+      0x7e, 0xab, 0x59, 0x52, 0x54, 0x9c, 0xd2, 0xe9,
+      0xef, 0xdd, 0x37, 0x1e, 0x8f, 0xcb, 0x8a, 0x90,
+      0xfc, 0x84, 0xe5, 0xf9, 0x14, 0x19, 0xdf, 0x6e,
+      0x23, 0xc4, 0x66, 0xeb, 0xcc, 0x22, 0x1c, 0x5c };
+
+
+The original description of an older database format called the per block counter start offset 'sistN' which seems to imply it to be constant for certain entries. They correspond to a "system number" of meta entries visible in the database software. Where these offsets come from is currently unknown, the existing code just brute forces through all offsets and looks for certain sentinels.
+
+In noticed that the first 256 bytes of CroStru.dat look close to identical (except the first 16 bytes) than CroBank.dat.
+
+
+##CroBank
+
+CroBank.dat contains the actual database entries for multiple tables as described in the CroStru file. After each chunk is re-assembled (and potentially decoded with the per block offset being the record number in the .tad file).
+
+Its first byte defines, which table it belongs to. It is encoded in cp1251 (or possibly IBM866) with actual column data separated by 0xfe. There is an extra concept of sub fields in those columns, indicated by a 0xfd byte.
+