diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'updates')
-rw-r--r-- | updates/2017/public-money-public-code.en.md | 55 |
1 files changed, 55 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/updates/2017/public-money-public-code.en.md b/updates/2017/public-money-public-code.en.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..1dc3e802 --- /dev/null +++ b/updates/2017/public-money-public-code.en.md | |||
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ | |||
1 | title: Open Letter: Public Money? Public Code! | ||
2 | date: 2017-09-12 21:25:00 | ||
3 | updated: 2017-09-13 08:59:52 | ||
4 | author: 46halbe | ||
5 | tags: update, pressemitteilung | ||
6 | previewimage: /images/pmpc.jpg | ||
7 | |||
8 | More than thirty organisations ask to improve public procurement of software. The Chaos Computer Club is asking everyone to sign the open letter. | ||
9 | |||
10 | <!-- TEASER_END --> | ||
11 | |||
12 | Digital services offered and used by public administrations are the | ||
13 | critical infrastructure of 21st-century democratic nations. To establish | ||
14 | trustworthy systems, government agencies must ensure they have full | ||
15 | control over systems at the core of our digital infrastructure. This is | ||
16 | rarely the case today due to restrictive software licences. | ||
17 | |||
18 | Today, 31 organisations are publishing an open letter \[1\] in which | ||
19 | they call for lawmakers to advance legislation requiring publicly | ||
20 | financed software developed for the public sector be made available | ||
21 | under a Free and Open Source Software licence. The initial signatories | ||
22 | include CCC, EDRi, Free Software Foundation Europe, KDE, Open Knowledge | ||
23 | Foundation Germany, openSUSE, Open Source Business Alliance, Open Source | ||
24 | Initiative, The Document Foundation, Wikimedia Deutschland, as well as | ||
25 | several others. | ||
26 | |||
27 | We ask individuals and other organisation to [sign the open | ||
28 | letter](https://publiccode.eu/#action). The open letter will be sent to | ||
29 | candidates for the German Parliament election and, during the coming | ||
30 | months, until the 2019 EU parliament elections, to other representatives | ||
31 | of the EU and EU member states. | ||
32 | |||
33 | Public institutions spend millions of Euros each year on the development | ||
34 | of new software tailored to their needs. The procurement choices of the | ||
35 | public sector play a significant role in determining which companies are | ||
36 | allowed to compete and what software is supported with tax | ||
37 | payers’ money. Public administrations on all levels frequently have | ||
38 | problems sharing code with each other, even if they funded its complete | ||
39 | development. Furthermore, without the option for independent third | ||
40 | parties to run audits or other security checks on the code, sensible | ||
41 | citizen data is at risk. | ||
42 | |||
43 | That is why the signatories call on representatives all around Europe to | ||
44 | modernise their digital infrastructure to allow other public | ||
45 | administrations, companies, or individuals to freely use, study, share | ||
46 | and improve applications developed with public money. Thereby providing | ||
47 | safeguards for the public administration against being locked in to | ||
48 | services from specific companies that use restrictive licences to hinder | ||
49 | competition, and ensuring that the source code is accessible so that | ||
50 | back doors and security holes can be fixed without depending on only one | ||
51 | service provider. | ||
52 | |||
53 | **Links**: | ||
54 | |||
55 | \[1\] [Open Letter](https://publiccode.eu/openletter/) | ||